North Carolina Passes Anti-CBDC Law, Embracing Digital Assets

July 16, 2026

North Carolina Representative Neal Jackson introduced legislation, the North Carolina Digital Asset Freedom Act, on April 10th, aiming to recognize “digital assets” as legally acceptable forms of payment and for tax purposes. This proposal centers around the concept of utilizing cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, as a secure and decentralized alternative to traditional monetary systems. While the specific wording of the bill doesn’t explicitly name Bitcoin, numerous provisions outline criteria that uniquely qualify Bitcoin – and potentially other similar assets – under the bill’s definition of a “digital asset.” The legislation reflects a broader trend within the United States of state-level initiatives focused on exploring the potential of digital assets, driven by concerns regarding inflation, the nation’s substantial federal debt, and the perceived decline in value of the US dollar.

Key Requirements for Digital Asset Recognition

The North Carolina Digital Asset Freedom Act establishes a stringent set of requirements for any digital asset seeking to be recognized under the bill’s framework. These conditions are designed to ensure the asset’s stability, security, and resistance to manipulation. First and foremost, any qualifying digital asset must possess a minimum market capitalization of $750 billion. This significant threshold underscores the need for broad market adoption and liquidity. Furthermore, the asset must demonstrate a daily trading volume exceeding $10 billion, reflecting substantial market activity and investor interest. The bill also mandates a documented history of at least 10 years of operation, indicating maturity and established patterns.

Beyond these quantitative metrics, the legislation places a strong emphasis on the underlying technology and characteristics of the digital asset. Notably, the bill requires proof of “censor resistance,” meaning the asset’s underlying technology should be inherently resistant to interference or control by any single entity. A “proof-of-work consensus” mechanism, typically associated with cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, is another essential requirement, contributing to the asset’s security and immutability. The act demands a complete lack of a central authority or foundation governing the asset, reinforcing the principle of decentralization. High network uptime – a consistent 99.98% or higher – is paramount, guaranteeing availability and reliability for transactions. Finally, the digital asset must have a capped maximum supply, preventing inflation and maintaining the value of the asset over time.

State Action Reflects National Trends

The introduction of the North Carolina Digital Asset Freedom Act is part of a larger movement across several US states to investigate digital assets, particularly cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, as a potential alternative to traditional monetary systems. This movement isn’t occurring in a vacuum; North Carolina’s actions align with a growing national conversation about the future of money and the role of decentralized technologies. The state’s proactive stance is motivated by concerns about persistent inflation within the United States, coupled with the significant and ongoing national debt. Simultaneously, there’s a heightened awareness of the potential depreciation of the US dollar, fostering interest in more resilient and independent financial instruments.

The state’s decisive action also stems from a deeper concern about the potential development and implementation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) by the Federal Reserve. Recognizing the risks associated with government-controlled digital currencies, North Carolina has taken a firm stance against their adoption. This resistance culminated in the successful override of Governor Roy Cooper’s veto of a bill banning CBDCs in July 2024. Cooper’s original objection to the bill was characterized as “premature, vague, and reactionary,” arguing that it responded to speculative threats rather than addressing tangible risks. The legislative pushback reveals a broader apprehension about the potential implications of centralized digital currencies for financial privacy, economic control, and individual liberty.

Legislative Overrides Demonstrate a Clear Position

In August 2024, a decisive vote within the North Carolina House of Representatives, 73-41, overwhelmingly overturned Governor Cooper’s veto, signaling a strong legislative consensus in favor of anti-CBDC legislation. This bipartisan action underscored the seriousness with which North Carolina lawmakers viewed the potential threats posed by government-controlled digital currencies. Subsequently, the North Carolina Senate followed suit, similarly overriding Cooper’s veto by a vote of 27-17. The culmination of these votes resulted in the passage of the anti-CBDC legislation into law in September 2024, demonstrating a unified front within the state government. This successful override not only solidified North Carolina’s commitment to safeguarding its financial autonomy but also positioned the state as a leader in resisting the broader trend towards CBDC adoption.

The legislative process highlights the importance of local governance in shaping national financial policy. North Carolina’s actions demonstrate that state-level innovation and critical assessment can play a crucial role in challenging prevailing narratives and advocating for responsible monetary policy. The state’s determination to prioritize decentralization and protect its citizens from potential governmental overreach sets a notable example for other jurisdictions considering similar approaches to digital asset regulation.

Industry Support Fuels the Momentum

The momentum behind the North Carolina Digital Asset Freedom Act has garnered significant support from within the cryptocurrency industry. Dan Spuller, the head of industry affairs at the Blockchain Association, publicly applauded the state’s proactive measures. In a September 9th post on X, Spuller argued that Governor Cooper’s initial veto was a missed opportunity. He characterized the veto as “premature, vague, and reactionary,” emphasizing that it responded to unsubstantiated threats rather than proactively safeguarding the state’s financial future. This endorsement from a leading industry advocacy organization highlights the importance of the legislation in promoting a stable and innovative digital asset ecosystem. The Blockchain Association’s support further strengthens the argument that embracing decentralized technologies, like cryptocurrencies, is a prudent and forward-thinking approach to managing economic risk and fostering economic opportunity.